dwm.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
<html>
<head>
<title>dwm - dynamic window manager</title>
<meta name="author" content="Anselm R. Garbe">
<meta name="generator" content="ed">
<meta name="copyright" content="(C)opyright 2006 by Anselm R. Garbe">
<style type="text/css">
body {
color: #000000;
font-family: sans-serif;
margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<img src="dwm.png"/><br />
<h3>dynamic window manager</h3>
</center>
<h3>Description</h3>
<p>
dwm is a dynamic window manager for X11.
</p>
<h3>Philosophy</h3>
<p>
As founder and main developer of wmii I came to the conclusion that
wmii is too clunky for my needs. I don't need so many funky features
and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only
want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got
finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I
considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a>
development model, which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of
dwm is simply <i>to fit my needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it.
</p>
<h3>Differences to wmii</h3
<p>
In contrast to wmii, dwm is only a window manager, and nothing else.
Hence, it is much smaller, faster and simpler.
</p>
<ul>
<li>
dwm has no 9P support, no editable tagbars, no shell-based
configuration and remote control and comes without any additional
tools like printing the selection or warping the mouse.
</li>
<li>
dwm is only a single binary, it's source code is intended to never
exceed 2000 SLOC.
</li>
<li>
dwm is customized through editing its source code, that makes it
extremely fast and secure - it does not process any input data which
hasn't been known at compile time, except window title names.
</li>
<li>
dwm is based on tagging and dynamic window management (however simpler
than wmii or larswm).
</li>
<li>
dwm don't distinguishes between layers, there is no floating or
managed layer. Wether the clients of currently selected tag are
managed or not, you can re-arrange all clients on the fly. Popup-
and fixed-size windows are treated unmanaged.
</li>
<li>
dwm uses 1-pixel borders to provide the maximum of screen real
estate to clients. Small titlebars are only drawn in front of unfocused
clients.
</li>
<li>
dwm reads from <b>stdin</b> to print arbitrary status text (like the
date, load, battery charge). That's much simpler than larsremote,
wmiir and what not...
</li>
<li>
Anselm <b>does not</b> want any feedback to dwm. If you ask for support,
feature requests, or if you report bugs, they will be <b>ignored</b>
with a high chance. dwm is only intended to fit Anselms needs.
However you are free to download and distribute/relicense it, with the
conditions of the <a href="http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm?f=f10eb1139362;file=LICENSE;style=raw">MIT/X Consortium license</a>.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Screenshot</h3>
<p>
<a href="http://wmii.de/shots/dwm-20060714.png">Click here for a screenshot</a> (20060714)
</p>
<h3>Development</h3>
<p>
dwm is actively developed in parallel to wmii. You can <a href="http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm">browse</a> its source code repository or get a copy using <a href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/">Mercurial</a> with following command:
</p>
<p>
<code>hg clone http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm</code>
</p>
<h3>Download</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://wmii.de/download/dwm-0.1.tar.gz">dwm 0.1</a> (12kb) (20060714)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Miscellaneous</h3>
<p>
You can purchase this <a href="https://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?op=article&article_id=3298632&view=403">tricot</a>
if you like dwm and the dwm logo, which has been designed by Anselm.
</p>
<p><small>--Anselm (20060714)</small></p>
</body>
</html>