compilers-aho/03-lexical-analysis.md
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
--- geometry: - lmargin=0.9in - rmargin=0.3in - tmargin=0.3in - bmargin=0.5in - twoside papersize: A4 ... \begin{huge} \textbf{Chapter 3 - Lexical Analysis} \end{huge} We usually use *lexical-analyser generators* to which we feed the patterns of the lexemes and the generator then produces code that works as a lexical analyser. These patterns are specified using regular expressions. These expressions are converted into NDFSM and then to DFSM. These two models are then fed to a "driver" that simulates these automaton and decide the next token. # The Role of the Lexical Analyzer - Main task - read the input characters of the source program, group them into lexemes and produces as output a sequence of tokens for each lexeme in the source program. The stream of tokens is then sent to the parser for syntax analysis - It also interacts with the symbol table. - The interactions between the parser and the lexical analyser are depicted in the Fig 1 and it's implemented in a way where the parser calls the lexical analyser by the *getNextToken* command. The calls causes the lexical analyser to read characters from the input and determine the next lexeme and produce the next token for the parser. ![Interaction between Lexical Analyser and parser](img/interaction-parser-lex.png){width=70%} - Lexical analyser may also perform some other tasks like stripping out whitespaces and comments. - It may also indicate errors by inserting error message in the appropriate lines by keeping track of line numbers and may also perform macro expansion. - Sometimes they are divided into **two processes**: 1. **Scanning** consists of simple process that do not require tokenization like deleting comments and whitespaces. 2. **Lexical Analysis** is the main part where the scanner produces output as a sequence of tokens. ## Lexical Analysis Versus Parsing. Reasons why the analysis process of compiler is split into lexical analyser and parser (syntax analyser): 1. **Simplicity of design**. The separation of tasks helps us simplify at leasts one of those tasks. Like the lexical analyser once done with dealing with whitespaces and comments, it's easier and simpler for the syntax analyser to parse it with the assumption that the comments and the whitespaces have been removed rather than having to process them as well. 2. **Compiler efficient is improved.** A separate lexical analyzer helps us to apply specialized techniques to improve the efficiency only of the lexical task. Like one example is using specialized buffering techniques during reading the input to speed up the compiler. 3. **Portability is enhanced**. Input-device-specific peculiarities can be restricted to lexical analyzer. ## Tokens, Patterns, and Lexemes - A **token** is a pair consisting of a token name and a token attribute value. The token name is an abstract symbol representing the kind of lexical unit, e.g., a keyword, or an identifier. - A **pattern** is a description of the form the lexemes of a token may take. In the case of a keyword as a token, the pattern is just a sequence of characters that form that keyword. - A **lexeme** is a sequence of characters that matches the pattern for a token and is identified by the lexical analyzer as an *instance* of that token. ## Attributes for tokens - Attribute values for tokens are used to provide more information about the token. For example a token of number matches both the lexemes `0` and `1`, thus to provide more information to the other phases of the compiler, attribute values are used. - The token name influences how the parsing is done, while the attribute value influences the translation of the tokens after the parse.