M BUGS → BUGS

@@ -1,41 +1,46 @@ 
+---
+
 18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
 18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
 18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
 
 reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
 
+---
 
 > enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
 > (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
-	>
-	> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
-	>
-	> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
-	>
-	> +       c = wintoclient(ev->window);
-	>        if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
-		>                unfocus(selmon->sel);
-		>                selmon = m;
-		>        }
-		> +       else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
-	> +               return;
-
+>
+> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
+>
+> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
+>
+> +       c = wintoclient(ev->window);
+>        if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
+>                unfocus(selmon->sel);
+>                selmon = m;
+>        }
+> +       else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
+> +               return;
 
+---
 
 > another corner case:
 
 a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
 on the main monitor
+
+---
 
 dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
 
+---
 
 yet another corner case:
 open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
 pointer there
 if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
 terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
-
 
 ---
 
@@ -57,3 +62,15 @@ privmail from 2 other people within one week, really strange).
 The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip 
 dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I 
 will address this issue shortly with a real fix. 
+
+---
+
+SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
+
+> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
+> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
+> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter. 
+
+Patching SDL, bugging them?
+
+---