M dev.c → dev.c

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ { Mod1Mask, XK_l, (void (*)(void *))spawn, xlock },
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_k, sel, "prev" }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_j, sel, "next" }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_t, tiling, NULL }, 
-	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, tiling, NULL }, 
+	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, floating, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_m, max, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_c, ckill, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_q, quit, NULL },

M dwm.html → dwm.html

@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ wmii is too clunky for my needs. I don't need so many funky features
 		and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only
 		want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got
 		finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I
-		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT model</a>
-		of developmentwhich was basically my mistake. Thus the philosophy of
-		dwm is to fit my needs. That's it.
+		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a>
+		development model, which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of
+		dwm is simply <i>to fit my needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it.
 		</p>
 		<h3>Differences to wmii</h3	
 		<p>